Buyer / Operator Map
The operators Seva writes for: roles at companies spending $1M+/month on ads and AI sales-led hyperscalers. What they care about, how they talk, what they read.
Shared Operator Dynamics
- Attribution is broken everywhere — iOS 14, cookie deprecation, dark funnel. No one has full signal.
- AI tool ROI is murky — every operator is experimenting but few can prove causation vs. correlation.
- Budget pressure: companies want efficiency AND growth simultaneously.
- Platform concentration — too much of everything runs through Meta and Google.
- Talent: there aren't enough people who understand both AI and GTM/performance marketing.
- Specific numbers — not 'we improved X' but 'X went from 4.2% to 7.1%'
- Named tools with honest assessments — not vendor-neutral platitudes
- Before/after comparisons with methodology
- Honest failure notes — what didn't work and why
- Short, dense — these people have no time. Every sentence needs to earn its place.
Head of Performance Marketing
Scale-stage SaaS (Notion, ClickUp, Monday.com, HubSpot) · Consumer-facing AI companies (Perplexity, Character.ai, Midjourney) · DTC/e-commerce at scale (Duolingo, Calm, Headspace) · Fintech growth companies (Ramp, Brex, Carta)
- ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) across all paid channels
- Efficient CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) at scale without blowing payback periods
- Creative performance — which ad creatives convert and why
- Cross-channel attribution — knowing what's actually driving acquisition
- Incrementality testing — separating real lift from measurement noise
- Platform concentration risk — too much spend on one channel
- Keeping CPMs manageable as competition on major platforms increases
- iOS 14 / signal loss still unresolved for attribution; many still flying blind
- TikTok ban uncertainty — major creative investment in a channel that might disappear
- AI-generated creative: does it actually perform or just reduce costs?
- Google PMax: opaque, hard to control, sometimes cannibalizes branded
- Platform CPMs rising as AI companies flood into paid (OpenAI, Anthropic Super Bowl ads as symptoms)
- Budget under pressure while leadership wants efficiency AND growth
- Incrementality testing is hard to operationalize; most companies fake it
Cautiously excited. Most have experimented with AI for creative copy, ad variation generation, and creative brief automation. Few have seen dramatic ROAS improvements. Main use cases: creative scaling (more variants from fewer source assets), copywriting speed, audience brief generation, and reporting automation. The big skepticism: 'AI creative vs. human creative performance' — most find AI creative underperforms on initial testing but is useful for volume and variation. Emerging: AI-native measurement and attribution tools that promise better incrementality modeling.
Specific before/after creative performance data. Real incrementality test results with methodology. Honest takes on 'AI creative that actually worked vs. AI creative that flopped.' Platform-specific playbooks with numbers. When someone says 'our CPM dropped 30% after X' — that stops the scroll. Generic 'AI will transform performance marketing' claims do not.
- DTC Newsletter / DTC Daily
- The Operators podcast
- Marketing Millennials newsletter (Daniel Murray)
- Social Media Marketing Podcast (Michael Stelzner)
- Measured podcast (incrementality-focused)
- Triple Whale community Slack
- Northbeam / Rockerbox user community
Head of User Acquisition
Mobile-first consumer apps (gaming, fintech, health, productivity) · Consumer AI apps at scale (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) · Subscription consumer products (Calm, Duolingo, Spotify) · B2C SaaS with self-serve motion (Notion, Canva, Figma)
- New install / signup volume at target CAC
- D1/D7/D30 retention rates (quality of acquired users)
- App store optimization (ASO) for organic + algorithmic lift
- Mobile attribution and SKAdNetwork complexity
- Paywall conversion rate and subscription LTV
- Creative testing velocity — shipping 20+ variants per week
- Channel mix: where is the next scalable channel after Meta saturates?
- SKAdNetwork and iOS privacy — still limiting targeting and measurement
- Meta CPMs increasing; CPI rising across categories
- AI-generated creatives saturating feeds — declining ad novelty
- Consumer AI apps (ChatGPT, Claude) now in direct competition for mobile UA budgets/attention
- TikTok regulatory uncertainty — can we build a real UA channel there?
Highly active users of AI for creative. AI-generated UGC-style videos (avatar creators, synthetic spokespersons) are an emerging channel — some seeing strong performance, others seeing fast fatigue. Also using AI for audience research, creative briefing, and voiceover production. The biggest 2026 question: can AI generate creatives that match human UGC performance at 1/10th the cost?
Creative testing results with specific metrics. 'Here's the creative + here's the D7 ROAS.' UA channel discoveries ('this channel worked for us at $X CPI'). iOS/privacy measurement solutions that actually work. Real subscription pricing experiments with results.
- mobiledevmemo.com (Eric Seufert)
- Substack newsletters from UA practitioners
- AppsFlyer / Adjust community content
- Mobile Dev Memo newsletter
- MobileAction blog
- Singular blog
Head of GTM
AI-native B2B companies at Series A-D · Sales-led AI companies (Gong, Glean, Writer, Decagon, Moveworks) · Hypergrowth B2B SaaS at $10M–$100M ARR · PLG companies expanding into enterprise (Notion, Linear, Figma)
- Sales cycle efficiency: pipeline velocity, conversion rates at each stage
- ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) definition and qualification
- Demand gen engine: is marketing generating qualified pipeline?
- Expansion revenue: land and expand mechanics
- Pricing strategy: per seat, consumption, outcomes-based
- Competitive positioning: how do we win vs. incumbent and next-gen competitors?
- Sales team structure: AE/SDR ratio, territories, compensation
- Enablement: can reps actually sell what we built?
- AI SDRs / outbound automation — if everyone automates, does outbound work at all?
- Pricing pressure: customers pushing back on per-seat pricing; want consumption or value-based
- ICP drift as AI-native buyers have different buying behavior than legacy enterprise
- Sales motion clarity: should we go PLG or stay sales-led as our product improves?
- How to get founder-dependent sales to transition to repeatable AE-driven motion
- Competition from OpenAI/Anthropic as platform players in every vertical
Actively evaluating AI tools for sales productivity: Gong, Chorus, Clari, AI-SDR tools (Artisan, 11x, Clay). Significant skepticism about fully autonomous outbound. Most valuable current use: call recording + coaching (Gong, Chorus), territory planning, and CRM hygiene automation. Emerging: AI for competitive intelligence and proposal generation. The big question: can AI actually close deals, or just automate the boring parts?
'Here is our actual pipeline conversion data before/after this change.' Specific sales cycle improvements with methodology. Honest takes on AI SDR ROI. ICP refinement stories with numbers. Win/loss insights that reveal something non-obvious about the market.
- SaaStr podcast and content (Jason Lemkin)
- Lenny's Newsletter (growth + GTM at top companies)
- Pavilion community and events
- OpenView Partners content
- Winning by Design (Jacco van der Kooij)
- Cerebro / RevOps Co-op community
Chief Revenue Officer / VP Revenue
Post-Series B B2B SaaS ($20M–$200M ARR) · AI-native companies with enterprise motion · Sales-led hyperscalers (Gong, Glean, Moveworks, Writer, Harvey)
- Revenue attainment vs. plan
- Sales team productivity: quota attainment distribution
- Forecasting accuracy: predictable revenue
- Hiring and ramping AEs quickly
- Comp plan design: balancing growth incentives with profitability
- Board relationship: delivering the number every quarter
- Market share vs. category-defining incumbent
- How to deploy AI to make reps more efficient without destroying sales culture
- SDR ROI is collapsing as AI outbound floods inboxes — rethinking the model
- Enterprise customers slowing decisions due to AI governance/security reviews
- Defending ACV against commoditization pressure as AI makes basics cheap
- Talent war for AEs who can navigate consultative AI sales conversations
- Board pressure to grow efficiently while capital markets tighten
- Platform risk: what happens to pipeline if OpenAI launches a competing feature?
Primary buyer of revenue AI tools. Gong/Chorus for call recording and deal intelligence, Clari/Salesforce Revenue Cloud for forecasting, Clay/Apollo/Artisan for SDR workflow. Growing interest in: AI for deal coaching, competitive battle cards, executive briefing automation. Fundamental skepticism: can AI actually help AEs close? Most believe AI helps the mediocre rep, not the top rep. The top reps already close through relationship.
Real quota attainment data before/after AI tool deployment. Specific AI-assisted deal stories with named customer. Honest CRO perspectives on whether AI SDRs replace or augment. Pipeline forecasting accuracy improvements with methodology. Board deck-worthy revenue growth cases that involve AI-enabled efficiency.
- SaaStr Annual conference and podcast
- Revenue Collective / Pavilion community
- CRO of the Year awards and profiles
- Bravado / Repvue (sales community and data)
Head of Growth
PLG companies (Notion, Figma, Loom, Linear, Webflow) · Consumer AI at scale (Perplexity, Character.ai, ChatGPT) · Hypergrowth SaaS with self-serve motion · B2C subscription apps
- Activation rate: do new users reach value fast enough?
- Retention curves: D7/D30/D90 retention and what bends them
- North Star Metric (NSM): the one number the whole company optimizes for
- Viral / referral loops: does the product grow itself?
- Monetization: when and how to convert free to paid
- Experimentation velocity: how many A/B tests can we run per week?
- Growth model: what are the levers and coefficients?
- AI products have non-obvious retention curves — users churn after novelty wears off
- How to build virality into AI products when the core interaction is private (chat)
- Usage-based pricing creates revenue volatility that's hard to model
- Personalization with AI raises privacy concerns that slow adoption
- Growth team relevance: as AI does more optimization, what's the human growth role?
- Attribution for AI-native marketing (hard to separate brand vs. performance)
Most experimentally advanced operators with AI. Use AI for: feature flagging analysis, experiment result interpretation, cohort analysis automation, onboarding personalization, and A/B test design. Many using AI to generate experiment hypotheses. The frontier: AI that monitors retention and automatically identifies drop-off points without analyst time. Skepticism: can AI really generate good hypotheses, or just faster bad ones?
Specific growth loop designs with metrics. 'We changed X in onboarding, retention went from Y to Z.' AI-specific growth patterns that are different from traditional SaaS. Real experiment results with methodology. North Star Metric choices and why — especially for AI products.
- Lenny's Newsletter (lennyrachitsky.com) — MUST READ for growth
- Reforge programs and content
- Andrew Chen's newsletter
- GrowthHackers community
- Product Hunt for tracking what's launching
Head of Demand Gen / Growth Marketing
B2B SaaS ($5M–$100M ARR) · AI-native enterprise companies · Sales-led companies that also have an inbound motion
- MQLs (Marketing Qualified Leads) and SQL (Sales Qualified Lead) conversion rate
- Pipeline contribution from marketing
- Content and SEO as compounding acquisition channels
- Webinar, event, and field marketing ROI
- ABM (Account-Based Marketing) for enterprise segment
- Marketing automation and nurture sequences
- Attribution: what marketing actually drives pipeline
- AI flooding every content channel — SEO being disrupted by AI search (Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
- MQL quality deteriorating as forms get easier to fill with AI assistance
- Dark funnel attribution: marketing creates demand but can't prove it
- Budget pressure: leadership wants more pipeline with less marketing spend
- Webinar and virtual event ROI collapsing as fatigue peaks
Heavy users of AI for content production, email copy, landing page optimization, and SEO brief generation. Mixed results on quality; many running human review layers over AI-generated drafts. Actively experimenting with AI for: intent signal analysis, personalized nurture sequences, and webinar follow-up automation. The SEO disruption is the biggest anxiety: if Google AI Overviews and Perplexity answer queries directly, organic content strategy needs a full rethink.
'Our content production volume went from X/month to Y/month with AI, and here's the quality impact.' Real pipeline attribution data from non-obvious channels. Dark funnel / community strategies that generated actual deals. ABM case studies with specific deal outcomes.
- Demand Gen U podcast (Chris Walker / Refine Labs)
- Marketing Against the Grain (HubSpot marketing team)
- B2B Marketing Benchmark data from Forrester/SiriusDecisions
- G2 research reports on buyer behavior
Creative Ops / Creative Strategy Lead
Companies spending $500K+/month on paid social · Consumer brands with heavy creative testing programs · DTC brands at scale · Consumer AI apps investing in paid UA
- Creative production volume: enough variants to test properly
- Creative quality threshold: what separates performing from non-performing ads
- Creative briefing: translating performance insights into creative direction
- Iteration speed: from insight to creative in <48 hours
- UGC (User Generated Content) sourcing and scaling
- Video production: how to produce video ads at scale without breaking budgets
- AI creative tools: promise vs. reality for actual performance
- AI-generated creatives are becoming ubiquitous — audience recognition and ad fatigue accelerating
- UGC saturation: the 'authentic' format is now faked by most brands
- Video production costs still high even with AI assistance
- Brand vs. performance tension: creative that converts often looks cheap
- Quality control at volume: AI generates faster than humans can QA
The most directly AI-affected operator role in this map. Already using: AI image generation for static ad creation (mixed results on performance), AI video tools for product demo variations, AI voiceover for video ad variants, AI-generated scripts and hooks, and AI tools for creative analysis (which hooks worked, why). The key insight from 2025-2026: AI accelerates creative production dramatically, but performance creative still requires human insight about what emotionally resonates. The job is shifting from 'make the creative' to 'direct the AI creative production.'
'Here's an AI-generated vs. human-generated ad performance comparison with real numbers.' Creative testing frameworks with specific winner/loser examples. AI video tool reviews with actual ad performance data (not just output quality). UGC automation results. What made a specific hook work — with the creative attached if possible.
- Creative Strategy Podcast
- Motion (creative analytics platform) blog and community
- Foreplay.co / Swipe-Worthy (creative inspiration)
- Facebook Ads Library as primary creative research tool
- TikTok Creative Center for trend signals
Lifecycle / CRM / Marketing Automation Lead
Subscription businesses (SaaS, consumer apps) · E-commerce with repeat purchase dynamic · B2C AI products focused on retention
- Onboarding completion rate and time-to-activation
- Churn prevention: identifying at-risk users before they cancel
- Email deliverability and engagement rates (open/click)
- Personalization: right message at right moment in lifecycle
- Upgrade/upsell flows: converting free or low-tier to higher-tier
- Win-back campaigns for churned users
- Push notification opt-in rates and engagement
- Apple Mail Privacy Protection broke open rates — can't measure without click
- Inbox zero behavior means emails compete for attention like never before
- AI-generated email content saturating inboxes — personalization loses signal
- Churn is accelerating in AI products as novelty wears off
- Building retention for AI products that users love but don't need daily
Heavy users of AI for email copy generation, subject line A/B testing, and personalization token population. Using AI for churn prediction models and behavioral segmentation. The most valuable use: AI that identifies which users are about to churn 14 days earlier than rule-based systems. The skepticism: AI-generated emails feel generic even when 'personalized' — open rates haven't moved.
'We added this AI trigger to our churn prevention sequence and reduced monthly churn by X%.' Real lifecycle flow designs with specific metrics. Email deliverability solutions that work. Personalization approaches that actually moved CTR vs. placebo. Apple MPP workarounds that give real engagement signals.
- Really Good Emails newsletter (creative inspiration)
- Klaviyo / Braze blog content
- Newsletter stack communities
RevOps / Revenue Operations Lead
Post-Series B B2B companies · Sales-led companies with multi-AE sales org · AI-native companies building a sales motion at scale
- CRM hygiene: is Salesforce/HubSpot data accurate?
- Pipeline visibility: can leadership trust the forecast?
- Sales process standardization: is every rep following the process?
- Quota setting and territory planning
- Compensation plan administration
- Tech stack management: 40+ tool sprawl
- Reporting and dashboards: one source of truth
- Handoff process: marketing → SDR → AE → CS
- AI adds more data but doesn't solve the data quality problem — garbage in, garbage out
- Tool sprawl getting worse as every vendor adds 'AI features'
- AI forecasting tools (Clari, etc.) still require clean underlying data to work
- Finance wants one version of truth; sales has six dashboards
- AI agent adoption in sales workflow creates new process compliance gaps
Cautiously optimistic. Most valuable AI use: CRM data enrichment (Clay, Apollo), automated meeting scheduling and follow-up logging, and AI-assisted quota modeling. Using Gong/Clari for deal intelligence. Biggest friction: AI tools require data quality that most sales orgs don't have. RevOps is often the person who has to make AI tools work despite messy data. The irony: AI needs RevOps to work, and RevOps needs AI to scale — but the dependency is circular.
'Here's how we cut CRM hygiene time by 60% with this AI workflow.' Specific RevOps automation stacks with tool names and costs. Forecast accuracy improvements before/after AI implementation. Process playbooks that actually reduce tool sprawl.
- RevOps Co-op community
- The RevOps Collective podcast
- Revenue.io content
- Clari / Salesforce blog content